The Big Day

Good luck to all the British National Party candidates standing today..BYE BYE Gordon....

Illegal Immigrant Campaigns for Labour’s Hazel Blears

An illegal immigrant has been canvassing for Labour’s Salford MP and former Cabinet minister Hazel Blears against the British National Party’s Tina Wingfield, it has emerged.

Nigerian Rhoda Sulaimon came to Britain on a student visa five years ago. Because the Tory and Labour parties scrapped any cross checking on who leaves Britain, the Nigerian simply stayed on.

She then proceeded to have a child and, although she is in Britain illegally, lives off welfare in a council house in Manchester, courtesy of the British taxpayer.

According to a newspaper report, a Labour campaign source was quoted as saying that the illegal immigrant “has been working voluntarily for Hazel Blears in the hope it might help her case.

“She doesn’t want to go back to Nigeria and is desperate to stay here. She’s been helping out for weeks at the local campaign office and has been out with Hazel when she meets people and goes out leafleting.”

Apparently the Nigerian had already been served with a notice on 16 April that she had 30 days to report for deportation.

The media reported that as of 30 April, she was still working at Mrs Blears’ Labour campaign office.

* Mrs Blears was forced to pay back £13,332 in capital gains tax after “flipping” her second home in the ongoing expenses swindle.

She had sold her South London home for £200,000 (£45,000 more than she paid) but escaped paying the tax by re-designating it as her primary home.

Later it emerged that she had “flipped” her second home three times in one year, all with the objective of swindling as much as she could out of the taxpayer.

Given Mrs Blear’s “expenses” swindling, it comes as no surprise that her campaign team consists of illegal immigrants who are also cheating the British taxpayer.

* The BNP’s candidate in Salford, Tina Wingfield, reports that her campaign is running well and that increasing numbers of people are turning to the BNP out of disgust at the disgraceful antics of Labour.

How Labour threw open doors to mass migration in secret plot to make a multicultural UK

Labour threw open the doors to mass migration in a deliberate policy to change the social make-up of the UK, secret papers suggest.

A draft report from the Cabinet Office shows that ministers wanted to ‘maximise the contribution’ of migrants to their ‘social objectives’.

The number of foreigners allowed in the UK increased by as much as 50 per cent in the wake of the report, written in 2000.

Labour has always justified immigration on economic grounds and denied it was using it to foster multiculturalism.

But suspicions of a secret agenda rose when Andrew Neather, a former government adviser and speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett, said the aim of Labour’s immigration strategy was to ‘rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’.

The document was not published in its original format over fears of an adverse public reaction. Instead it was released a year later as a research document on the economic benefits of migration.
THE UNEDITED DOCUMENT

The highlighted text below was contained in the original draft of the document drawn up in 2000 for a discussion on immigration policy - but deleted from the version published in 2001.


1) The emerging consensus, in both the UK and the rest of the EU, is that we need a new analytical framework for thinking about migration policy if we are to maximise the contribution of migration to the Government's economic and social objectives.

2) Indeed, over the medium to longer term, migration pressures will intensify in Europe as a result of demographic changes. But this should not be viewed as a negative - to the extent that migration is driven by market forces, it is likely to be economically beneficial. On the other hand, trying to halt of reverse market-driven migration will be very difficult (perhaps impossible) and economically damaging.

3) Chapter 4, focusing on the Government's aim to regulate migration to the UK in the interests of social stability and economic growth, argues that it is clearly correct that the Government has both economic and social objectives for migration policy.

4) The more general social impact of migration is very difficult to assess. Benefits include a widening of consumer choice and significant cultural contributions. These in turn feed into wider economic benefits.

5) In practice, entry controls can contribute to social exclusion, and there are a number of areas where policy could further enhance migrants' economic and social contribution in line with the Government's overall objectives.

6) It is clear that migration policy has both social and economic impacts and should be designed to contribute to the government's overall objectives on both counts. The current position is a considerable advance on the previously existing situation, when the aim of immigration policy was, or appeared to be, to reduce primary immigration to the 'irreducible minimum' - an objective with no economic or social justification.

Mr Neather’s claims last October were denied by ministers, including Justice Secretary Jack Straw, who said they were nonsense.

A draft of the original Cabinet Office report has now been published following a freedom of information request by Migrationwatch.

It contains six references to social policy, all of which were removed from the later, published version.

One deleted paragraph said a framework was needed to ‘maximise the contribution of migration to the Government’s social and economic objectives’.

Another says that migration pressures will intensify because of demographic changes across Europe but that this ‘should not be viewed as a negative’.

It states: ‘The entry control system is not closely related to the stated policy objectives.

'This is particularly true in the social area, where in the past the implicit assumption has largely been that keeping people out promotes stability.’

Also cut out was a statement that ‘in practice, entry controls can contribute to social exclusion’.

Damian Green, Tory immigration spokesman, said: ‘This is a very significant finding because it would mean that Labour’s biggest long term effect on British society was
based on a completely secret policy.

‘This shows Labour’s open-door immigration policy was deliberate and ministers should apologise.’

Mr Neather’s claims were made in a column for the London Evening Standard. He said Labour’s relaxation of immigration controls was a deliberate attempt to engineer a ‘truly multicultural’ country and plug gaps in the jobs market.

He remembered ‘coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity’.

Whitehall research shows that the number of foreigners arriving in the UK rose from 370,000 in 2001 to 510,000 in 2006.

The figures for net foreign immigration– the number of non-British citizens arriving, less the number leaving – are even more dramatic.

In 2001, this figure stood at 221,000 but by 2007 it had risen as high as 333,000 – up 50 per cent.

The number fell to 250,000 in 2008 mainly because of a decline in arrivals from Eastern Europe.

It had already emerged that the Cabinet Office report was censored to remove details of possible links between immigration and organised crime, street fights and begging.

One of the sections missing from the final report said: ‘There is emerging evidence that the circumstances in which asylum seekers are living is leading to criminal offences, including fights and begging.’

A second section warned: ‘Migration has opened up new opportunities for organised crime.’

Last night, immigration minister Phil Woolas said there was ‘no open door policy on migration’.

He said the draft report made clear that migration was ‘not a substitute for Government policies on skills, education and training of British citizens – which the Government has invested in over the past decade’.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1249797/Labour-threw-open-doors-mass-migration-secret-plot-make-multicultural-UK.html#ixzz0medDhKUI

Mold with Rotten polititions

Why would anyone stand with a party with a history like this ?



SEX:

. Tory Party General election candidate, Michael Powell – Convicted and jailed for 3 years for downloading hardcore child porn.

. Tory Party Councillor (Wickbar/Bristol) Roger Talboys – Convicted and jailed for 6 years for multiple sex attacks on children.

. Tory Party Vice-Chairman of Welsh Conservatives, Andrew Baker – Received a banning order for stalking women.

. Tory Party MP (Billericay) Harvey Proctor – Stood trial for sex offences of a sado-masochistic nature against teenage boys, and was forced to resign.

. Tory Party Councillor ( Stratford-upon-Avon ) Christopher Pilkington – Convicted of downloading hardcore child porn on his PC. Placed on sex offenders register and forced to resign.

. Tory Party councillor ( Coventry ), Peter Stidworthy – Charged with indecent assault of a 15-year old boy.

. Tory Party Mayor ( North Tyneside ), Chris Morgan – Forced to resign after being arrested twice in 2 weeks, for indecent assault on a 15-year old girl, and for suspicion of downloading child porn.

. Tory Party MEP, Tom Spencer – Caught smuggling drugs and porn through customs.

. Tory Party councillor and former Mayor (Wrexham), Michael Morris – Convicted and put on probation for 2 years, for the indecent assault of another man, which was captured on CCTV.

. Tory Party Liaison Manager on the London Assembly, Douglas Campbell, who’s job includes running the Tory GLA website – Arrested for allegedly downloading child porn. He is currently suspended while the Police investigation continues.

VIOLENCE:

. Tory Party MP (Henley), Boris Johnson – Caught on tape plotting to have a man beaten up by a hired thug. The man was a journalist who had written an unsympathetic piece about Johnson’s close friend – Convicted fraudster, Darius Guppy.

. Tory Party Councillor (Folkestone – in Leader, Michael Howard’s constituency), Robert Richdale – 41 year history of crime, involving 30 convictions and 5 prison sentences. Richdales enormous criminal record, which covers 10 pages of A4 paper, includes convictions for assault, theft, causing death by dangerous driving, forgery, drugs offences, possession of an offensive weapon, and sex attacks against underage schoolgirls. The Tory Party election campaign literature described Richdale as “a family man” who had a “compassionate personality”

CORRUPTION:

. Tory Party councillor (Dudley), Abdul Quadus, who was also chairman of the Dudley Police Committee and a Tory Party spokesman on crime – Convicted and jailed for 6 months for passport fraud and assisting illegal immigration from his native country – Pakistan.

. Former Tory Party Cabinet Minister, Jonathan Aitken – Convicted and jailed for Perjury and Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.

. Former Tory Leader of Westminster Council, Dame Shirley Porter – Fled to Israel to evade justice after indulging in fraud, corruption and gerrymandering on a massive scale, and stealing millions of pounds from local taxpayers.

. Tory Party Councillor ( Margate ), Colin Kiddell – Forced to resign after Police investigation into his alleged theft and embezzlement of funds from the local `Dreamland` Amusement Park.

. Former Tory Party Chairman and London Mayoral Candidate, Jeffrey Archer – Convicted and jailed for Perjury and Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.

MP Bob Laxton paid £34k by county builders

A CITY MP has accepted thousands of pounds worth of donations from a Derbyshire-based construction firm.

Over a ten- year period, Derby North MP Bob Laxton says he was given approximately £34,000 by the firm Bowmer and Kirkland, which has its head office in Heage.

The donations, which are all correctly recorded in the parliamentary register of members' interests, were given to help pay for the cost of running Mr Laxton's constituency office.

Mr Laxton, leader of Derby City Council before he became an MP in 1997, said: "The donations were given from the company towards helping open up my Derby office and pay the rent.

"They thought I had done good things for Derby, were happy that I'd become an MP and wanted me to continue to work for the city."

Under parliamentary rules all MPs must register any donations they receive from third parties.

The official register shows that between 1997-8 and 2007-8 Mr Laxton received four donations of about £5,000 and five donations of about £6,500 from the construction firm.

There were three further registered entries for donations which did not specify an amount. Mr Laxton explained, however, that they were worth about £1,000 each.

The Labour MP agreed that the sum total of all the donations over the 10 years amounted to about £34,000.

However, one political opponent of Mr Laxton said the public might have questions about such donations, which would not "help the image of politics".

In 2007 Bowmer and Kirkland won a £38m contract to transform The Roundhouse, at Pride Park, for Derby College – the scheme was completed in 2009.

Mr Laxton was involved in helping Derby College liaise with East Midlands Development Agency and Derby City Council in the project's earlier stages.

The Conservative candidate for Derby North, Stephen Mold, said: "I don't think that anything improper has taken place here.

"But there might be questions that come up in people's minds and I don't think that helps the image of politics given everything that we've been through recently.

"I can only say that there needs to be 100% transparency and there need to be the tightest possible rules on MPs accepting money from third parties. MPs also need to think about what they do very carefully."

However, Mr Laxton said there was no conflict of interest because he had absolutely no contact with Bowmer and Kirkland regarding the Roundhouse or any other scheme in the city.

He said: "Before the Roundhouse, Derby College did not have a presence in the city and I brought them together with the council to see if there was potential to bring the college to that site.

"I had absolutely no contact with Bowmer and Kirkland over the Roundhouse and had nothing to do with the awarding of the contract, which was done by Derby College."

A spokesman for Bowmer and Kirkland, which employs 350 at its headquarters in Heage, said: "The Roundhouse project was subject to a European Union procurement process.

"That means we are required to go through a pre-qualification process before we are invited to tender. We bid and won the contract for the scheme through a competitive tender. We bid to Derby College and its advisers."

When asked why it had donated to Mr Laxton's office, the firm did not want to comment further.

Meanwhile the college itself also said that it was legally bound to follow UK and EU rules relating to the contracts.

A spokesperson said: "Regulations lay down strict selection and award criteria that are fully transparent and auditable.

"These regulations were strictly followed, from the initial advertising of the contract in the Official Journal of the European Union through to its final award."

Migrant city's cry for help

The impact of uncontrolled mass immigration on the fabric of British life was driven home to the party leaders yesterday.
A letter to Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg reveals in graphic detail the struggle of one community to cope.
It says public services - from schooling to housing, healthcare to police protection - are overstretched because councils have not been given the support they need.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1264963/Migrant-citys-help-Anguished-letter-Brown-Cameron-reveals-devastating-toll-immigration.html#ixzz0kgLOwFWV

BNP Unveils Its 2010 Campaign Issues: Afghanistan, Immigration and the Global Warming Conspiracy

The British National Party will campaign in the 2010 general election on the issues of withdrawal from Afghanistan, a halt to the immigration invasion and an end to the ‘Global Warming’ conspiracy, party leader Nick Griffin MEP has announced.

“We are proud to map out three central and core policy issues which clearly differentiate us from every other political party in Britain,” Mr Griffin said.

“Every other party, Lib Dems and UKIP included, have announced their support for continued British military presence in Afghanistan.

“Only the BNP is unequivocally opposed to this war and demands that all British troops be withdrawn immediately.

“This must be done straightaway, right now,” Mr Griffin said.

“There is not a single grain of Afghan sand that is worth the blood of a British soldier.

“It is a tragic and criminal waste of our young people’s lives and out tax money to even be there, never mind the legal issues involved which indicate that the war itself is illegal,” he said.

The BNP’s position on immigration was also well known, Mr Griffin continued.

“Once again, only the BNP has mapped out policies and solutions to the immigration invasion which are perfectly in line with voter concerns,” he continued.

“All the other parties are in favour of immigration, either through the fake ‘points-based’ nonsense, a ‘balanced migration’ con trick or some other subterfuge.

“Only the BNP demands an end to mass Third World immigration and the implementation of policies which will not only halt this colonisation of our nation by the Third World, but will indeed reverse it as well.”

The third main plank of the BNP’s campaign will be a focus on opposing and exposing the ‘man-made global warming’ conspiracy, Mr Griffin said.

“We will make voters aware that this now totally debunked theory is being used to systematically de-industrialise what is left of the British manufacturing industry and pay over billions to build up and modernise the industries of India and China,” he said.

“The global warming fraud is being used as an excuse to pile stealth taxes and undemocratic controls on the already long-suffering public.

“For example, the taxes mean an extra £18 billion on electricity bills alone,” Mr Griffin said.

“These are the issues about which voters are concerned and on which we will campaign,” Mr Griffin said, adding that the BNP’s opponents never tried to debate policy and instead resorted to attempted character assassination and baseless smears.

“The BNP will however campaign on our policies and we are confident that the voters will make their choices on that basis. The British National Party is the only party which has a coherent, logical and just policy programme which will rescue our great nation,” he concluded.

* The BNP’s manifesto is currently being finalised and will focus heavily on the economy and the need to rebuild Britain’s manufacturing industry which is the only way that real jobs and lasting prosperity can be guaranteed.

* The BBC has created a party policy comparison tool on its website which is surprisingly unbiased and gives a nearly accurate reflection of the BNP’s position on most major issues of the day.