Green Ribbons and Muslim sensitivities

Taking a trip down Memory Lane – September 2005: 60,000 copies of the British National Party’s newspaper Freedom, were seized at Dover Docks as the authorities sought legal advice on the front page article “What about showing some solidarity with the British People!”

This was the article, written just three months after the London tube and bus bombings which left 56 people dead and more than 700 injured.

“OUR PEOPLE, our Christian values and our British way of life are under attack from Islamic terrorists living in our very midst.

Fifty-six innocent people making their way to work in our capital city are no longer with us because of bombs planted by the followers of a dangerous, archaic creed that wants to take civilisation back to the Middle Ages.

You would have thought that our police forces would be rallying around to show support for the British people and clamping down on the communities from where the suicide bombers came from.

You would have thought that our trade unions would be boosting the morale of the British people, rallying them to stand firm in the face of the followers of a totalitarian religion that is prepared to indiscriminately kill to further their ends.

But you would be wrong. Police in Nottinghamshire are wearing green ribbons to show solidarity with the Muslim community.

Twenty thousand “Good Faith” ribbons will be worn by officers to symbolise belief in Muslims as a people of peace.

Chief Constable Steve Green said: “We have a huge number of Muslim citizens in Nottinghamshire. They feel intimidated and sometimes ostracised by the perception that the white community suspects everybody with a brown face of being a suicide bomber.”

Green’s prompt initiative over Islamic ribbons is in stark contrast to his force’s disappointing clear-up rate for crime in Nottinghamshire. His force is under review by the Home Office after it was revealed that cases had to be “farmed out” to other forces to get them solved.

Bedforshire Police were another force who took prompt action, this time in the hunt for terrorists. They issued an 18-point guide to officers dealing with Muslims who are suspected of terrorism.

The guidelines state that ‘the Muslim community feels victimised and suspicious of counter terrorist police operations’.

Officer must:
• Community leaders should be consulted before raids into Muslim houses.
• Officers should not searcg occupied bedrooms and bathrooms before dawn.
• Use of police dogs will be considered serious desecration of the premises.
• Cameras and camcorders should not be used in case capturing women in inappropriate dress.
• If people are praying at home officers should stand aside and not disrupt the prayer. They should be allowed the opportunity to finish.
• Officers should take their shoes off before raiding a Muslim house.
• The reasons for pre-dawn raids on Muslim houses needs to be clear and transparent.
• Officers must not touch holy books or religious artefacts without permission.
• Muslim prisoners should be allowed to take additional clothing to the station.

A Bedfordshire Police spokesman said: “The guidelines had been issued to all staff as a reminder of the force protocol when entering a Muslim household.”

The National Union of Teachers were also quick of the mark issuing a 4-page A4 brochure to teachers on the terrorist attacks. But despite the traumatic effect of the terrorists attacks being timed to coincide with pupils travelling to schools, the NUT didn’t seem too concerned about the effect of this on children.

NUT advice was in the main about the well-being of pupils and teachers from minority ethnic groups and any negative and stereotyped views of Islam and Muslims being expressed by parents. In fact much of the brochore was given over to challenging Islamophobia, tackling racism and any tensions that might arise between different ethnic groups.

Since the terrorist attacks in July the political correct brigade within the police, the trade unions and the media have succeded in turning truth and logic on its head. Within a month of innocent British people being slaughtered, apparently it is no longer us who are the victims or Islamic fanatics who are to blame.

Now it is the Muslim community living in Britain must have our sympathy and it is the British people who are responsible for causing their discomfort.”

After holding the newspapers for 72 hours, they were released after the Department for Public Prosecutions said there was no case to answer.

BNP Cares for World War II Hero in East Midlands

Snowbound George, an ex Royal Naval war hero, was set to celebrate his 90th birthday with nothing more than a half empty tub of margarine in his freezer, reports East Midlands British National Party press officer John Ryde.

“However, George is a member of the British National Party and was called by the BNP call centre, as they are doing for all of our elderly members, to see if he was alright during the present winter weather,” Mr Ryde said.

“When they heard of his plight, the call centre immediately contacted East Midlands regional organiser Geoff Dickens who set the wheels in motion to bring food and company to George.

“Activist Peter Cheeseman found out what was needed on the shopping list and collected it from a nearby supermarket and took it round for George — and included a few luxuries.

“George asked how much he had to pay, but Pete said ‘Happy Birthday, this is on me, from one member to another.’

“The British National Party is more than a political party and it practises what it preaches. We have to thank all those caring people within the party who are making this an event right across snowbound Britain,” Mr Ryde said.

Derby UKIP steals BNP policy

The phony UKIP party, already struggling with internal dissent after the shock resignation of one of its MEPs, has shamelessly stolen another British National Party policy with the announcement that it wants burkas banned.

The BNP debated this issue at its annual conference two years ago and adopted a motion calling for the banning of the burka from public view in Britain.

The BNP decided at the time that the wearing of the burka was an affront to British values, society and civilisation, and had no place in this country which had struggled so hard to ensure equal rights for women.

At the time, the BNP was the only party to sound the alarm about the threat of militant Islamism in Britain. Now that events have proven the BNP correct, the shameless opportunists of the UKIP party have tried to steal this policy, Nick Griffin told BNP News.

“It is pathetic and will fool no-one,” Mr Griffin said. “The public know only too well that UKIP is a one-issue pressure group whose leader already formally offered to disband that party if the Tories agreed to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.

“The public also know that UKIP supports the fake ‘balanced migration’ scam which has been drawn up by Tory and Labour insiders to trick the public into thinking that it is alright to flood the country with Third World immigrants as long as the population numbers remain the same.

“In the light of all that, I doubt if UKIP’s most fanatical supporters will believe the latest policy theft is motivated by a genuine concern for Britain’s future,” Mr Griffin said.

He added that the BNP believed that anyone wanting to cover their faces in public (except in extreme cold weather) was motivated by bad faith.

“What possible purpose can there be to covering one’s face in public except if one is up to no good?” Mr Griffin continued.

“Only criminals, far-left UAF-type gangsters and others intent on public harm feel the need to cover their faces.

“The BNP therefore would argue for a total ban on covering one’s face in public applicable to all face masks and not just of burkas,” Mr Griffin said.

“We are confident that the public knows that the BNP is the only party which first announced and actually believes these policy positions.

“Unlike UKIP, the BNP adopted these policies not for populist trickery but because we were the first to see them as essential to preserving the British nature of our country.

“On that basis, we reject the UKIP fraud for what it is: political opportunism of the worst degree. That party has no policies apart from a hatred of the EU, and is now being forced to steal from the BNP’s wide range of policies in order to dress up their skeleton.”

ALMOST two million new homes will have to be built just to cope with the immigrant influx, peers told.

It means 263 houses must go up every day until 2026 – the equivalent of five cities the size of Birmingham during the next 18 years.

Four in 10 of all new homes will go to new migrants, a report by Migrationwatch UK claims. Chair­man Sir Andrew Green said immigration levels “are 25 times higher than at any time in nearly a thousand years of our history”.

He added: “The economic ‘benefits’ are trumpeted by the Govern­ment at every opportunity.

“But very little is ever heard of the costs, such as the huge addition to infrastructure requirements in or­der to build the millions of homes required for new immigrants.” The extra pressure on schools, transport and health services “will have massive ramifications for everyone living in this country for decades to come”, he added.

Migration into England will grow from 130,000 a year now to 171,500 in 2026, according to the Gov­ernment’s own projections.

Sir Andrew said the country is already very nearly the most crowded in Europe. “We cannot allow this to continue. Our objective now must be a broad balance between immigration and emigration,” he added.

The growth of the annual influx will see the number of new immigrant households rise from 73,000 now to 96,000 in 2026.

National scandal: Over 36,000 Britons Died Prematurely Last Winter – How Many Thousands More This Winter?

In the winter period of December to March 2008/09 there were an estimated 36,700 more deaths in England and Wales, compared with the average for the non-winter period (see definition below). This was an increase of 49 percent compared with the number in the previous winter 2007/08. This is the highest number of excess winter deaths since the winter of 1999/2000, when excess winter mortality was nearly a third higher than in 2008/09.

The elderly population experiences the greatest increase in deaths each winter. In the winter of 2008/09 there were 29,400 more deaths among those aged 75 and over, compared with levels in the non-winter period. In contrast, there were 7,300 excess winter deaths among those under the age of 75.

The number of extra deaths occurring in winter varies depending on temperature, the level of disease in the population, and other factors. Increases in deaths from respiratory and circulatory diseases are responsible for most of the excess winter mortality. Influenza is often implicated in winter deaths as it can cause complications such as bronchitis and pneumonia, especially in the elderly, although relatively few deaths are attributed to influenza itself. According to the Health Protection Agency (HPA), influenza activity started early and reached moderate levels during the winter of 2008/09, but did not reach the epidemic levels seen in the winter of 1999/2000.

So how many of our frailer fellow citizens will perish prematurely this winter — twenty thousand, thirty thousand — forty thousand perhaps? Who knows? This, however, is not a question that is likely to trouble any of our bloated “honourable” Members as they tuck into their lavish, taxpayer funded, Christmas dinners this Yuletide.

Depression test

ANGER AT MIGRANT VISA COSTS

Each immigrant can bring in as many as 120 relatives under the visa scheme

TAXPAYERS are footing a £50million-a-year bill to fund appeals by relatives of immigrants barred from Britain.

More than 1,000 are lodged every week, it was revealed last night. The caseload has soared eightfold since the Government scrapped fees for family visitor visas in 2002. Critics last night warned that the explosion in the number of appeals was more evidence that Labour has lost control of Britain’s borders. The visa shambles was uncovered in a report from the population think tank Migrationwatch. Chairman Sir Andrew Green said: “In the current recession it is no longer acceptable that taxpayers should pay the appeal costs for foreign nationals wishing to visit Britain. The defin­ition of a family visitor is so wide that it could include as many as 120 relatives of a middle-aged ­person. The definition should be narrowed and charges which the Government abolished in 2002 should be re-introduced.” More than 400,000 applications for immigrants’ relatives to visit Britain for up to six months are made every year. The number of appeals has risen from 7,997 in 2002 to 64,669 in 2007-08. Family visitor visas are available for relatives including parents, grandparents, uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces and cousins of immigrants already living here who want to come to the UK. Applicants are expected to prove that they will stay for no longer than six months and are not coming to Britain to work. But critics fear the system is full of loopholes and is being exploited as yet another way for illegal immigrants to sneak into the country.
Sir Andrew said: “Obviously, family members should be able to visit relatives in Britain but such visits need to be properly regulated. There is a clear risk that, once here, some of these visitors will stay on illegally knowing that the chance of them being removed is remote.” In 2008, a total of 414,000 applications for family visitor visas were made, of which 312,000 were approved. Around 197,000 of those applications came from India, Pakistan and Nigeria. Of those, 134,000 were approved. Yet despite the huge number of approvals, failed applicants are allowed to challenge the refusals without charge. Previously, they had to pay £150 for an appeal or £500 if they wished to attend an appeal hearing in person. In January 2001, the Government reduced the fees to £50 and £125, then scrapped them altogether in May 2002. As a result, the number of appeals has soared. The Migrationwatch report said: “Fees should be re-instated. There is no reason why the British taxpayer should pay the appeal costs of foreign visitors.” It also criticised the wide definition of family member. “The definition should be substantially tightened, at least until exit controls are in place. “In particular, uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces, and first cousins should no longer be included. This would reduce the number of elig­ible relatives by up to 68,” the report said. “This definition of family visitor is so widely drawn that somebody from a third world country where the number of children per family is often four or five, could sponsor somewhere between 80 and 120 people under this scheme. “Furthermore, the provision for unmarried couples is particularly hard to verify and is therefore open to abuse.” It also called for sponsors of applicants to be asked to provide a cash bond guaranteeing that their relatives leave the country. The appeal system was introduced in 1999 after pressure from immigrant communities. In the first year only 137 appeals were made. The average cost of an appeal to the Asylum and Immigration ­Tribunal in the financial year 2005/6 was £762. A UK Border Agency Spokesperson said: “The Government believes it is fair that someone who has been refused a family visit visa may have the right to appeal.

“The Government is also committed to reducing the cost of the appeal system by cutting out unnecessary and inappropriate appeals and improving decision quality. The overall cost of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT) has been falling over the last three years. We are consulting on options for migrants to cover at least some of the cost of appeals.

“Applications from all over the world are assessed in the same rigorous manner and against the same immigration rules.'

The Destruction of Britain’s Culture and Heritage: Police Drop “Christmas” from Poster Campaign

In the latest example of how Britain’s indigenous culture is being supplanted by imported and alien cultures through the mass immigration invasion, British police have dropped the word “Christmas” from their annual poster campaign.

The shocking development has seen the British Transport Police drop the word “Christmas” from a nationwide poster campaign in order not to “upset people who do not buy into the festival.” This of course means the ever-growing numbers of Muslims who are the only other religious denomination present in Britain which seeks the extinction of all other religions.

The word “Christmas” appeared on the original draft of the poster, as it does every year. The campaign is designed to alert people to the extra number of transport police on duty over the Christmas and New Year period.

The original slogan read “Christmas presence,” which was a clever pun on the phrase “Christmas Presents,” referring to the fact that police would be on duty to protect the public.

The reference to Christmas was however determined by the police’s own “marketing department” to be offensive to “people from other faiths who disliked its Christian connotations.”

The politically-correct madmen then ordered the word “Christmas” dropped and replaced with the word “Holiday” so that it now reads “Holiday Presence” which is of course no pun at all and destroys the original creativity of the poster, never mind being offensive to the indigenous population who do indeed celebrate Christmas.

The decision to remove the word Christmas was apparently made by the Transport Police’s marketing manager, Alison Lock.

The British National Party wishes it placed on record that it is sick and tired of seeing this country’s indigenous people, their culture and their traditions put last each and every time.

No-one would dream of going to a Muslim country and demanding that they stop publicly celebrating or announcing their traditions “for fear of offending Christians” or any other faith.

Britain has a right to celebrate and maintain its traditions in the same way that any other nation or people have — and this includes the right to ensure that its population remains majority ethnically British. This is the only way in which it can be guaranteed that our traditions, culture and civilisation remain British.

Maybe you would like this..?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6uDpiX3nCE&feature=player_embedded