The Big Day

Good luck to all the British National Party candidates standing today..BYE BYE Gordon....

Illegal Immigrant Campaigns for Labour’s Hazel Blears

An illegal immigrant has been canvassing for Labour’s Salford MP and former Cabinet minister Hazel Blears against the British National Party’s Tina Wingfield, it has emerged.

Nigerian Rhoda Sulaimon came to Britain on a student visa five years ago. Because the Tory and Labour parties scrapped any cross checking on who leaves Britain, the Nigerian simply stayed on.

She then proceeded to have a child and, although she is in Britain illegally, lives off welfare in a council house in Manchester, courtesy of the British taxpayer.

According to a newspaper report, a Labour campaign source was quoted as saying that the illegal immigrant “has been working voluntarily for Hazel Blears in the hope it might help her case.

“She doesn’t want to go back to Nigeria and is desperate to stay here. She’s been helping out for weeks at the local campaign office and has been out with Hazel when she meets people and goes out leafleting.”

Apparently the Nigerian had already been served with a notice on 16 April that she had 30 days to report for deportation.

The media reported that as of 30 April, she was still working at Mrs Blears’ Labour campaign office.

* Mrs Blears was forced to pay back £13,332 in capital gains tax after “flipping” her second home in the ongoing expenses swindle.

She had sold her South London home for £200,000 (£45,000 more than she paid) but escaped paying the tax by re-designating it as her primary home.

Later it emerged that she had “flipped” her second home three times in one year, all with the objective of swindling as much as she could out of the taxpayer.

Given Mrs Blear’s “expenses” swindling, it comes as no surprise that her campaign team consists of illegal immigrants who are also cheating the British taxpayer.

* The BNP’s candidate in Salford, Tina Wingfield, reports that her campaign is running well and that increasing numbers of people are turning to the BNP out of disgust at the disgraceful antics of Labour.

How Labour threw open doors to mass migration in secret plot to make a multicultural UK

Labour threw open the doors to mass migration in a deliberate policy to change the social make-up of the UK, secret papers suggest.

A draft report from the Cabinet Office shows that ministers wanted to ‘maximise the contribution’ of migrants to their ‘social objectives’.

The number of foreigners allowed in the UK increased by as much as 50 per cent in the wake of the report, written in 2000.

Labour has always justified immigration on economic grounds and denied it was using it to foster multiculturalism.

But suspicions of a secret agenda rose when Andrew Neather, a former government adviser and speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett, said the aim of Labour’s immigration strategy was to ‘rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’.

The document was not published in its original format over fears of an adverse public reaction. Instead it was released a year later as a research document on the economic benefits of migration.
THE UNEDITED DOCUMENT

The highlighted text below was contained in the original draft of the document drawn up in 2000 for a discussion on immigration policy - but deleted from the version published in 2001.


1) The emerging consensus, in both the UK and the rest of the EU, is that we need a new analytical framework for thinking about migration policy if we are to maximise the contribution of migration to the Government's economic and social objectives.

2) Indeed, over the medium to longer term, migration pressures will intensify in Europe as a result of demographic changes. But this should not be viewed as a negative - to the extent that migration is driven by market forces, it is likely to be economically beneficial. On the other hand, trying to halt of reverse market-driven migration will be very difficult (perhaps impossible) and economically damaging.

3) Chapter 4, focusing on the Government's aim to regulate migration to the UK in the interests of social stability and economic growth, argues that it is clearly correct that the Government has both economic and social objectives for migration policy.

4) The more general social impact of migration is very difficult to assess. Benefits include a widening of consumer choice and significant cultural contributions. These in turn feed into wider economic benefits.

5) In practice, entry controls can contribute to social exclusion, and there are a number of areas where policy could further enhance migrants' economic and social contribution in line with the Government's overall objectives.

6) It is clear that migration policy has both social and economic impacts and should be designed to contribute to the government's overall objectives on both counts. The current position is a considerable advance on the previously existing situation, when the aim of immigration policy was, or appeared to be, to reduce primary immigration to the 'irreducible minimum' - an objective with no economic or social justification.

Mr Neather’s claims last October were denied by ministers, including Justice Secretary Jack Straw, who said they were nonsense.

A draft of the original Cabinet Office report has now been published following a freedom of information request by Migrationwatch.

It contains six references to social policy, all of which were removed from the later, published version.

One deleted paragraph said a framework was needed to ‘maximise the contribution of migration to the Government’s social and economic objectives’.

Another says that migration pressures will intensify because of demographic changes across Europe but that this ‘should not be viewed as a negative’.

It states: ‘The entry control system is not closely related to the stated policy objectives.

'This is particularly true in the social area, where in the past the implicit assumption has largely been that keeping people out promotes stability.’

Also cut out was a statement that ‘in practice, entry controls can contribute to social exclusion’.

Damian Green, Tory immigration spokesman, said: ‘This is a very significant finding because it would mean that Labour’s biggest long term effect on British society was
based on a completely secret policy.

‘This shows Labour’s open-door immigration policy was deliberate and ministers should apologise.’

Mr Neather’s claims were made in a column for the London Evening Standard. He said Labour’s relaxation of immigration controls was a deliberate attempt to engineer a ‘truly multicultural’ country and plug gaps in the jobs market.

He remembered ‘coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity’.

Whitehall research shows that the number of foreigners arriving in the UK rose from 370,000 in 2001 to 510,000 in 2006.

The figures for net foreign immigration– the number of non-British citizens arriving, less the number leaving – are even more dramatic.

In 2001, this figure stood at 221,000 but by 2007 it had risen as high as 333,000 – up 50 per cent.

The number fell to 250,000 in 2008 mainly because of a decline in arrivals from Eastern Europe.

It had already emerged that the Cabinet Office report was censored to remove details of possible links between immigration and organised crime, street fights and begging.

One of the sections missing from the final report said: ‘There is emerging evidence that the circumstances in which asylum seekers are living is leading to criminal offences, including fights and begging.’

A second section warned: ‘Migration has opened up new opportunities for organised crime.’

Last night, immigration minister Phil Woolas said there was ‘no open door policy on migration’.

He said the draft report made clear that migration was ‘not a substitute for Government policies on skills, education and training of British citizens – which the Government has invested in over the past decade’.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1249797/Labour-threw-open-doors-mass-migration-secret-plot-make-multicultural-UK.html#ixzz0medDhKUI

Mold with Rotten polititions

Why would anyone stand with a party with a history like this ?



SEX:

. Tory Party General election candidate, Michael Powell – Convicted and jailed for 3 years for downloading hardcore child porn.

. Tory Party Councillor (Wickbar/Bristol) Roger Talboys – Convicted and jailed for 6 years for multiple sex attacks on children.

. Tory Party Vice-Chairman of Welsh Conservatives, Andrew Baker – Received a banning order for stalking women.

. Tory Party MP (Billericay) Harvey Proctor – Stood trial for sex offences of a sado-masochistic nature against teenage boys, and was forced to resign.

. Tory Party Councillor ( Stratford-upon-Avon ) Christopher Pilkington – Convicted of downloading hardcore child porn on his PC. Placed on sex offenders register and forced to resign.

. Tory Party councillor ( Coventry ), Peter Stidworthy – Charged with indecent assault of a 15-year old boy.

. Tory Party Mayor ( North Tyneside ), Chris Morgan – Forced to resign after being arrested twice in 2 weeks, for indecent assault on a 15-year old girl, and for suspicion of downloading child porn.

. Tory Party MEP, Tom Spencer – Caught smuggling drugs and porn through customs.

. Tory Party councillor and former Mayor (Wrexham), Michael Morris – Convicted and put on probation for 2 years, for the indecent assault of another man, which was captured on CCTV.

. Tory Party Liaison Manager on the London Assembly, Douglas Campbell, who’s job includes running the Tory GLA website – Arrested for allegedly downloading child porn. He is currently suspended while the Police investigation continues.

VIOLENCE:

. Tory Party MP (Henley), Boris Johnson – Caught on tape plotting to have a man beaten up by a hired thug. The man was a journalist who had written an unsympathetic piece about Johnson’s close friend – Convicted fraudster, Darius Guppy.

. Tory Party Councillor (Folkestone – in Leader, Michael Howard’s constituency), Robert Richdale – 41 year history of crime, involving 30 convictions and 5 prison sentences. Richdales enormous criminal record, which covers 10 pages of A4 paper, includes convictions for assault, theft, causing death by dangerous driving, forgery, drugs offences, possession of an offensive weapon, and sex attacks against underage schoolgirls. The Tory Party election campaign literature described Richdale as “a family man” who had a “compassionate personality”

CORRUPTION:

. Tory Party councillor (Dudley), Abdul Quadus, who was also chairman of the Dudley Police Committee and a Tory Party spokesman on crime – Convicted and jailed for 6 months for passport fraud and assisting illegal immigration from his native country – Pakistan.

. Former Tory Party Cabinet Minister, Jonathan Aitken – Convicted and jailed for Perjury and Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.

. Former Tory Leader of Westminster Council, Dame Shirley Porter – Fled to Israel to evade justice after indulging in fraud, corruption and gerrymandering on a massive scale, and stealing millions of pounds from local taxpayers.

. Tory Party Councillor ( Margate ), Colin Kiddell – Forced to resign after Police investigation into his alleged theft and embezzlement of funds from the local `Dreamland` Amusement Park.

. Former Tory Party Chairman and London Mayoral Candidate, Jeffrey Archer – Convicted and jailed for Perjury and Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.

MP Bob Laxton paid £34k by county builders

A CITY MP has accepted thousands of pounds worth of donations from a Derbyshire-based construction firm.

Over a ten- year period, Derby North MP Bob Laxton says he was given approximately £34,000 by the firm Bowmer and Kirkland, which has its head office in Heage.

The donations, which are all correctly recorded in the parliamentary register of members' interests, were given to help pay for the cost of running Mr Laxton's constituency office.

Mr Laxton, leader of Derby City Council before he became an MP in 1997, said: "The donations were given from the company towards helping open up my Derby office and pay the rent.

"They thought I had done good things for Derby, were happy that I'd become an MP and wanted me to continue to work for the city."

Under parliamentary rules all MPs must register any donations they receive from third parties.

The official register shows that between 1997-8 and 2007-8 Mr Laxton received four donations of about £5,000 and five donations of about £6,500 from the construction firm.

There were three further registered entries for donations which did not specify an amount. Mr Laxton explained, however, that they were worth about £1,000 each.

The Labour MP agreed that the sum total of all the donations over the 10 years amounted to about £34,000.

However, one political opponent of Mr Laxton said the public might have questions about such donations, which would not "help the image of politics".

In 2007 Bowmer and Kirkland won a £38m contract to transform The Roundhouse, at Pride Park, for Derby College – the scheme was completed in 2009.

Mr Laxton was involved in helping Derby College liaise with East Midlands Development Agency and Derby City Council in the project's earlier stages.

The Conservative candidate for Derby North, Stephen Mold, said: "I don't think that anything improper has taken place here.

"But there might be questions that come up in people's minds and I don't think that helps the image of politics given everything that we've been through recently.

"I can only say that there needs to be 100% transparency and there need to be the tightest possible rules on MPs accepting money from third parties. MPs also need to think about what they do very carefully."

However, Mr Laxton said there was no conflict of interest because he had absolutely no contact with Bowmer and Kirkland regarding the Roundhouse or any other scheme in the city.

He said: "Before the Roundhouse, Derby College did not have a presence in the city and I brought them together with the council to see if there was potential to bring the college to that site.

"I had absolutely no contact with Bowmer and Kirkland over the Roundhouse and had nothing to do with the awarding of the contract, which was done by Derby College."

A spokesman for Bowmer and Kirkland, which employs 350 at its headquarters in Heage, said: "The Roundhouse project was subject to a European Union procurement process.

"That means we are required to go through a pre-qualification process before we are invited to tender. We bid and won the contract for the scheme through a competitive tender. We bid to Derby College and its advisers."

When asked why it had donated to Mr Laxton's office, the firm did not want to comment further.

Meanwhile the college itself also said that it was legally bound to follow UK and EU rules relating to the contracts.

A spokesperson said: "Regulations lay down strict selection and award criteria that are fully transparent and auditable.

"These regulations were strictly followed, from the initial advertising of the contract in the Official Journal of the European Union through to its final award."

Migrant city's cry for help

The impact of uncontrolled mass immigration on the fabric of British life was driven home to the party leaders yesterday.
A letter to Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg reveals in graphic detail the struggle of one community to cope.
It says public services - from schooling to housing, healthcare to police protection - are overstretched because councils have not been given the support they need.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1264963/Migrant-citys-help-Anguished-letter-Brown-Cameron-reveals-devastating-toll-immigration.html#ixzz0kgLOwFWV

BNP Unveils Its 2010 Campaign Issues: Afghanistan, Immigration and the Global Warming Conspiracy

The British National Party will campaign in the 2010 general election on the issues of withdrawal from Afghanistan, a halt to the immigration invasion and an end to the ‘Global Warming’ conspiracy, party leader Nick Griffin MEP has announced.

“We are proud to map out three central and core policy issues which clearly differentiate us from every other political party in Britain,” Mr Griffin said.

“Every other party, Lib Dems and UKIP included, have announced their support for continued British military presence in Afghanistan.

“Only the BNP is unequivocally opposed to this war and demands that all British troops be withdrawn immediately.

“This must be done straightaway, right now,” Mr Griffin said.

“There is not a single grain of Afghan sand that is worth the blood of a British soldier.

“It is a tragic and criminal waste of our young people’s lives and out tax money to even be there, never mind the legal issues involved which indicate that the war itself is illegal,” he said.

The BNP’s position on immigration was also well known, Mr Griffin continued.

“Once again, only the BNP has mapped out policies and solutions to the immigration invasion which are perfectly in line with voter concerns,” he continued.

“All the other parties are in favour of immigration, either through the fake ‘points-based’ nonsense, a ‘balanced migration’ con trick or some other subterfuge.

“Only the BNP demands an end to mass Third World immigration and the implementation of policies which will not only halt this colonisation of our nation by the Third World, but will indeed reverse it as well.”

The third main plank of the BNP’s campaign will be a focus on opposing and exposing the ‘man-made global warming’ conspiracy, Mr Griffin said.

“We will make voters aware that this now totally debunked theory is being used to systematically de-industrialise what is left of the British manufacturing industry and pay over billions to build up and modernise the industries of India and China,” he said.

“The global warming fraud is being used as an excuse to pile stealth taxes and undemocratic controls on the already long-suffering public.

“For example, the taxes mean an extra £18 billion on electricity bills alone,” Mr Griffin said.

“These are the issues about which voters are concerned and on which we will campaign,” Mr Griffin said, adding that the BNP’s opponents never tried to debate policy and instead resorted to attempted character assassination and baseless smears.

“The BNP will however campaign on our policies and we are confident that the voters will make their choices on that basis. The British National Party is the only party which has a coherent, logical and just policy programme which will rescue our great nation,” he concluded.

* The BNP’s manifesto is currently being finalised and will focus heavily on the economy and the need to rebuild Britain’s manufacturing industry which is the only way that real jobs and lasting prosperity can be guaranteed.

* The BBC has created a party policy comparison tool on its website which is surprisingly unbiased and gives a nearly accurate reflection of the BNP’s position on most major issues of the day.

I am An Englishman and proud

Please follow this link

British People Put Last: Schools, NHS Face Cuts — But Foreign Aid Budget Increases

A careful analysis of this week’s budget has shown that Government spending on essential services at home such as the NHS and schools will be cut next year — while the foreign aid budget continues to grow.

According to the budget, huge cuts are going to be made in infrastructure provision in Britain over the next four years, from £50 billion this year to £22 billion by the 2013–14 financial year.

Capital expenditure on hospitals and schools currently accounts for £13 billion. This figure is set to drop to £6 billion over the next four years, which translates into a combined cut of more than £20 billion.

This means that despite rising demand, investment in extra wards and other healthcare facilities for British people will be more than halved over the next four years.

At the same time, the foreign aid budget is set to increase from its current £9 billion budget to £13 billion over the next few years.

Recent projects announced by the Department for International Development (the foreign aid section of the UK government) include a £38 million grant aimed at “reducing extreme poverty in 69,000 households” in Zambia and £10 million to “provide stable jobs for workers in Africa.”

In 2007/08 the biggest recipients of DFID’s multilateral aid were the European Commission (EC) which was given £1.2 billion, the World Bank Group which was given £493 million, and assorted UN agencies which were given £296 million.

The Labour government and the Conservative Party have both promised to “ring fence” and increase the foreign aid budget no matter what other cuts in expenditure have to be made.

The cuts to the health service and school infrastructure are even more shocking when they are compared to the ongoing expenditure of at least £3 billion per year on the war in Afghanistan, the billions spent on EU membership and the estimated £4 billion per year spent subsidising ‘asylum seekers’ in Britain.

Only the British National Party will call a halt to this Tory/Labour anti-British madness and ensure that British tax money is first and foremost spent on British people.

Pakistani workforce at council is boosted by recruitment drive

A COMMUNITY leader has praised a recruitment scheme, believed to be the only one in the country, aimed at increasing the number of Pakistani workers at Derby City Council.Shokat Lal said the Pakistani Recruitment Initiative Project had helped members of his community to find jobs at the council and also with private employersThe project, now ended after running for 12 months, was set up after the council realised it was failing to employ enough people from Derby's largest ethnic minority group, which it is required to do by law.Final figures are not yet available but by last November 43 Pakistani people had been recruited, compared to just 12 during 2007-8 and 22 between March 2008 and April 2009. Mr Lal said: "We had been concerned for about six years that Pakistani people were under-represented in the city council workforce.

"A series of initiatives were set up to encourage more ethnic minorities to try for jobs. These included job training and language lessons. "Although these were successful, it still left Pakistani people under-represented." The council then decided to set up the Pakistani Recruitment Initiative Project. Mr Lal thinks it has been successful, as it has offered practical help with CVs, interview techniques and work experience through day courses and work placements. He said: "People have been encouraged to do volunteering, shadowing people in jobs and helping with administrative work. As a result there are now a substantial number of people in employment. "The city council has been very courageous setting up the scheme, which I think is the only one in the country." One principal council officer was seconded to oversee the project at no extra cost. It led to 200 people registering online to receive help. A council spokesman said: "To have a city council of 12,000 employees that reflects the community there needs to be about 480 Pakistani people, which was a deficit of 288 as of last April." The spokesman said other ethnic minority groups in the city were not under-represented in the council workforce.

Traitor........A cancer in our political system......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttz8-ucWhYc&feature=related

Simon Hughes.......Traitor........you decide

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeC8ZIPA88E

Green Ribbons and Muslim sensitivities

Taking a trip down Memory Lane – September 2005: 60,000 copies of the British National Party’s newspaper Freedom, were seized at Dover Docks as the authorities sought legal advice on the front page article “What about showing some solidarity with the British People!”

This was the article, written just three months after the London tube and bus bombings which left 56 people dead and more than 700 injured.

“OUR PEOPLE, our Christian values and our British way of life are under attack from Islamic terrorists living in our very midst.

Fifty-six innocent people making their way to work in our capital city are no longer with us because of bombs planted by the followers of a dangerous, archaic creed that wants to take civilisation back to the Middle Ages.

You would have thought that our police forces would be rallying around to show support for the British people and clamping down on the communities from where the suicide bombers came from.

You would have thought that our trade unions would be boosting the morale of the British people, rallying them to stand firm in the face of the followers of a totalitarian religion that is prepared to indiscriminately kill to further their ends.

But you would be wrong. Police in Nottinghamshire are wearing green ribbons to show solidarity with the Muslim community.

Twenty thousand “Good Faith” ribbons will be worn by officers to symbolise belief in Muslims as a people of peace.

Chief Constable Steve Green said: “We have a huge number of Muslim citizens in Nottinghamshire. They feel intimidated and sometimes ostracised by the perception that the white community suspects everybody with a brown face of being a suicide bomber.”

Green’s prompt initiative over Islamic ribbons is in stark contrast to his force’s disappointing clear-up rate for crime in Nottinghamshire. His force is under review by the Home Office after it was revealed that cases had to be “farmed out” to other forces to get them solved.

Bedforshire Police were another force who took prompt action, this time in the hunt for terrorists. They issued an 18-point guide to officers dealing with Muslims who are suspected of terrorism.

The guidelines state that ‘the Muslim community feels victimised and suspicious of counter terrorist police operations’.

Officer must:
• Community leaders should be consulted before raids into Muslim houses.
• Officers should not searcg occupied bedrooms and bathrooms before dawn.
• Use of police dogs will be considered serious desecration of the premises.
• Cameras and camcorders should not be used in case capturing women in inappropriate dress.
• If people are praying at home officers should stand aside and not disrupt the prayer. They should be allowed the opportunity to finish.
• Officers should take their shoes off before raiding a Muslim house.
• The reasons for pre-dawn raids on Muslim houses needs to be clear and transparent.
• Officers must not touch holy books or religious artefacts without permission.
• Muslim prisoners should be allowed to take additional clothing to the station.

A Bedfordshire Police spokesman said: “The guidelines had been issued to all staff as a reminder of the force protocol when entering a Muslim household.”

The National Union of Teachers were also quick of the mark issuing a 4-page A4 brochure to teachers on the terrorist attacks. But despite the traumatic effect of the terrorists attacks being timed to coincide with pupils travelling to schools, the NUT didn’t seem too concerned about the effect of this on children.

NUT advice was in the main about the well-being of pupils and teachers from minority ethnic groups and any negative and stereotyped views of Islam and Muslims being expressed by parents. In fact much of the brochore was given over to challenging Islamophobia, tackling racism and any tensions that might arise between different ethnic groups.

Since the terrorist attacks in July the political correct brigade within the police, the trade unions and the media have succeded in turning truth and logic on its head. Within a month of innocent British people being slaughtered, apparently it is no longer us who are the victims or Islamic fanatics who are to blame.

Now it is the Muslim community living in Britain must have our sympathy and it is the British people who are responsible for causing their discomfort.”

After holding the newspapers for 72 hours, they were released after the Department for Public Prosecutions said there was no case to answer.

BNP Cares for World War II Hero in East Midlands

Snowbound George, an ex Royal Naval war hero, was set to celebrate his 90th birthday with nothing more than a half empty tub of margarine in his freezer, reports East Midlands British National Party press officer John Ryde.

“However, George is a member of the British National Party and was called by the BNP call centre, as they are doing for all of our elderly members, to see if he was alright during the present winter weather,” Mr Ryde said.

“When they heard of his plight, the call centre immediately contacted East Midlands regional organiser Geoff Dickens who set the wheels in motion to bring food and company to George.

“Activist Peter Cheeseman found out what was needed on the shopping list and collected it from a nearby supermarket and took it round for George — and included a few luxuries.

“George asked how much he had to pay, but Pete said ‘Happy Birthday, this is on me, from one member to another.’

“The British National Party is more than a political party and it practises what it preaches. We have to thank all those caring people within the party who are making this an event right across snowbound Britain,” Mr Ryde said.

Derby UKIP steals BNP policy

The phony UKIP party, already struggling with internal dissent after the shock resignation of one of its MEPs, has shamelessly stolen another British National Party policy with the announcement that it wants burkas banned.

The BNP debated this issue at its annual conference two years ago and adopted a motion calling for the banning of the burka from public view in Britain.

The BNP decided at the time that the wearing of the burka was an affront to British values, society and civilisation, and had no place in this country which had struggled so hard to ensure equal rights for women.

At the time, the BNP was the only party to sound the alarm about the threat of militant Islamism in Britain. Now that events have proven the BNP correct, the shameless opportunists of the UKIP party have tried to steal this policy, Nick Griffin told BNP News.

“It is pathetic and will fool no-one,” Mr Griffin said. “The public know only too well that UKIP is a one-issue pressure group whose leader already formally offered to disband that party if the Tories agreed to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.

“The public also know that UKIP supports the fake ‘balanced migration’ scam which has been drawn up by Tory and Labour insiders to trick the public into thinking that it is alright to flood the country with Third World immigrants as long as the population numbers remain the same.

“In the light of all that, I doubt if UKIP’s most fanatical supporters will believe the latest policy theft is motivated by a genuine concern for Britain’s future,” Mr Griffin said.

He added that the BNP believed that anyone wanting to cover their faces in public (except in extreme cold weather) was motivated by bad faith.

“What possible purpose can there be to covering one’s face in public except if one is up to no good?” Mr Griffin continued.

“Only criminals, far-left UAF-type gangsters and others intent on public harm feel the need to cover their faces.

“The BNP therefore would argue for a total ban on covering one’s face in public applicable to all face masks and not just of burkas,” Mr Griffin said.

“We are confident that the public knows that the BNP is the only party which first announced and actually believes these policy positions.

“Unlike UKIP, the BNP adopted these policies not for populist trickery but because we were the first to see them as essential to preserving the British nature of our country.

“On that basis, we reject the UKIP fraud for what it is: political opportunism of the worst degree. That party has no policies apart from a hatred of the EU, and is now being forced to steal from the BNP’s wide range of policies in order to dress up their skeleton.”

ALMOST two million new homes will have to be built just to cope with the immigrant influx, peers told.

It means 263 houses must go up every day until 2026 – the equivalent of five cities the size of Birmingham during the next 18 years.

Four in 10 of all new homes will go to new migrants, a report by Migrationwatch UK claims. Chair­man Sir Andrew Green said immigration levels “are 25 times higher than at any time in nearly a thousand years of our history”.

He added: “The economic ‘benefits’ are trumpeted by the Govern­ment at every opportunity.

“But very little is ever heard of the costs, such as the huge addition to infrastructure requirements in or­der to build the millions of homes required for new immigrants.” The extra pressure on schools, transport and health services “will have massive ramifications for everyone living in this country for decades to come”, he added.

Migration into England will grow from 130,000 a year now to 171,500 in 2026, according to the Gov­ernment’s own projections.

Sir Andrew said the country is already very nearly the most crowded in Europe. “We cannot allow this to continue. Our objective now must be a broad balance between immigration and emigration,” he added.

The growth of the annual influx will see the number of new immigrant households rise from 73,000 now to 96,000 in 2026.

National scandal: Over 36,000 Britons Died Prematurely Last Winter – How Many Thousands More This Winter?

In the winter period of December to March 2008/09 there were an estimated 36,700 more deaths in England and Wales, compared with the average for the non-winter period (see definition below). This was an increase of 49 percent compared with the number in the previous winter 2007/08. This is the highest number of excess winter deaths since the winter of 1999/2000, when excess winter mortality was nearly a third higher than in 2008/09.

The elderly population experiences the greatest increase in deaths each winter. In the winter of 2008/09 there were 29,400 more deaths among those aged 75 and over, compared with levels in the non-winter period. In contrast, there were 7,300 excess winter deaths among those under the age of 75.

The number of extra deaths occurring in winter varies depending on temperature, the level of disease in the population, and other factors. Increases in deaths from respiratory and circulatory diseases are responsible for most of the excess winter mortality. Influenza is often implicated in winter deaths as it can cause complications such as bronchitis and pneumonia, especially in the elderly, although relatively few deaths are attributed to influenza itself. According to the Health Protection Agency (HPA), influenza activity started early and reached moderate levels during the winter of 2008/09, but did not reach the epidemic levels seen in the winter of 1999/2000.

So how many of our frailer fellow citizens will perish prematurely this winter — twenty thousand, thirty thousand — forty thousand perhaps? Who knows? This, however, is not a question that is likely to trouble any of our bloated “honourable” Members as they tuck into their lavish, taxpayer funded, Christmas dinners this Yuletide.

Depression test

ANGER AT MIGRANT VISA COSTS

Each immigrant can bring in as many as 120 relatives under the visa scheme

TAXPAYERS are footing a £50million-a-year bill to fund appeals by relatives of immigrants barred from Britain.

More than 1,000 are lodged every week, it was revealed last night. The caseload has soared eightfold since the Government scrapped fees for family visitor visas in 2002. Critics last night warned that the explosion in the number of appeals was more evidence that Labour has lost control of Britain’s borders. The visa shambles was uncovered in a report from the population think tank Migrationwatch. Chairman Sir Andrew Green said: “In the current recession it is no longer acceptable that taxpayers should pay the appeal costs for foreign nationals wishing to visit Britain. The defin­ition of a family visitor is so wide that it could include as many as 120 relatives of a middle-aged ­person. The definition should be narrowed and charges which the Government abolished in 2002 should be re-introduced.” More than 400,000 applications for immigrants’ relatives to visit Britain for up to six months are made every year. The number of appeals has risen from 7,997 in 2002 to 64,669 in 2007-08. Family visitor visas are available for relatives including parents, grandparents, uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces and cousins of immigrants already living here who want to come to the UK. Applicants are expected to prove that they will stay for no longer than six months and are not coming to Britain to work. But critics fear the system is full of loopholes and is being exploited as yet another way for illegal immigrants to sneak into the country.
Sir Andrew said: “Obviously, family members should be able to visit relatives in Britain but such visits need to be properly regulated. There is a clear risk that, once here, some of these visitors will stay on illegally knowing that the chance of them being removed is remote.” In 2008, a total of 414,000 applications for family visitor visas were made, of which 312,000 were approved. Around 197,000 of those applications came from India, Pakistan and Nigeria. Of those, 134,000 were approved. Yet despite the huge number of approvals, failed applicants are allowed to challenge the refusals without charge. Previously, they had to pay £150 for an appeal or £500 if they wished to attend an appeal hearing in person. In January 2001, the Government reduced the fees to £50 and £125, then scrapped them altogether in May 2002. As a result, the number of appeals has soared. The Migrationwatch report said: “Fees should be re-instated. There is no reason why the British taxpayer should pay the appeal costs of foreign visitors.” It also criticised the wide definition of family member. “The definition should be substantially tightened, at least until exit controls are in place. “In particular, uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces, and first cousins should no longer be included. This would reduce the number of elig­ible relatives by up to 68,” the report said. “This definition of family visitor is so widely drawn that somebody from a third world country where the number of children per family is often four or five, could sponsor somewhere between 80 and 120 people under this scheme. “Furthermore, the provision for unmarried couples is particularly hard to verify and is therefore open to abuse.” It also called for sponsors of applicants to be asked to provide a cash bond guaranteeing that their relatives leave the country. The appeal system was introduced in 1999 after pressure from immigrant communities. In the first year only 137 appeals were made. The average cost of an appeal to the Asylum and Immigration ­Tribunal in the financial year 2005/6 was £762. A UK Border Agency Spokesperson said: “The Government believes it is fair that someone who has been refused a family visit visa may have the right to appeal.

“The Government is also committed to reducing the cost of the appeal system by cutting out unnecessary and inappropriate appeals and improving decision quality. The overall cost of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT) has been falling over the last three years. We are consulting on options for migrants to cover at least some of the cost of appeals.

“Applications from all over the world are assessed in the same rigorous manner and against the same immigration rules.'

The Destruction of Britain’s Culture and Heritage: Police Drop “Christmas” from Poster Campaign

In the latest example of how Britain’s indigenous culture is being supplanted by imported and alien cultures through the mass immigration invasion, British police have dropped the word “Christmas” from their annual poster campaign.

The shocking development has seen the British Transport Police drop the word “Christmas” from a nationwide poster campaign in order not to “upset people who do not buy into the festival.” This of course means the ever-growing numbers of Muslims who are the only other religious denomination present in Britain which seeks the extinction of all other religions.

The word “Christmas” appeared on the original draft of the poster, as it does every year. The campaign is designed to alert people to the extra number of transport police on duty over the Christmas and New Year period.

The original slogan read “Christmas presence,” which was a clever pun on the phrase “Christmas Presents,” referring to the fact that police would be on duty to protect the public.

The reference to Christmas was however determined by the police’s own “marketing department” to be offensive to “people from other faiths who disliked its Christian connotations.”

The politically-correct madmen then ordered the word “Christmas” dropped and replaced with the word “Holiday” so that it now reads “Holiday Presence” which is of course no pun at all and destroys the original creativity of the poster, never mind being offensive to the indigenous population who do indeed celebrate Christmas.

The decision to remove the word Christmas was apparently made by the Transport Police’s marketing manager, Alison Lock.

The British National Party wishes it placed on record that it is sick and tired of seeing this country’s indigenous people, their culture and their traditions put last each and every time.

No-one would dream of going to a Muslim country and demanding that they stop publicly celebrating or announcing their traditions “for fear of offending Christians” or any other faith.

Britain has a right to celebrate and maintain its traditions in the same way that any other nation or people have — and this includes the right to ensure that its population remains majority ethnically British. This is the only way in which it can be guaranteed that our traditions, culture and civilisation remain British.

Maybe you would like this..?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6uDpiX3nCE&feature=player_embedded